licking lexicogriphobia

I used to pay attention to sports. Prior to living in Connecticut I loved baseball. Our street was quiet enough that in the evenings we could play stick ball right out in the front yard and on the street without too many interruptions from cars. Just like the pros hitting a home run meant hitting it over the fence. Of course in our case it was the fence of our neighbors across the street. Stick ball was much more interesting that baseball because there were some considerable technique changes when your bat is uneven. This made the game much more fun.

My lawn mowing money in those days went to baseball cards and even the kids’ club of the local team, the Los Angeles Dodgers. Joining that club meant I’d get regular mail once a month in the mailbox while the season was going just like an adult. Getting something in the mail always feels good. Dodgers games would come on the TV and dutifully plan our day to make sure we could sit and watch. When they’d call a player to bat I’d look through my humble stack of baseball cards to see what a player’s stats were. I didn’t really understand how they were calculated, but I knew some numbers were better than others.

Then there was a strike and the sport I love wasn’t as important. If the pros didn’t see why they loved the game, why should I? In addition we moved and were trapped between Yankee and Red Sox territory. Scared that my nonexistent popularity would decrease further if I picked the wrong camp to join, I didn’t join any camp. To this day I don’t know sports players as well as most of the people I’ve worked with. I don’t have a favorite pitcher in base ball, quarter back in football, winger in hockey, forward in soccer, or bowler in cricket. But I do have a favorite lexicographer.

Yes, I have a favorite lexicographer.

In short a Lexicographer is someone who puts the words in the dictionary.

One might think that before selecting my favorite of anything I would come up with complex metrics like they do in the sports area and develop stats for each potential candidate. I did consider this as a method, but I didn’t know how to evaluate the degree of difficutly in conjunction with numbers of words. For example, a word like gongoozle only has one meaning. Adding that to the dictionary is rather simple.

Gongoozle verb

1. to stare at the activity in a canal

Ah, but try being the lexicographer who unluckily has to update the entry on the word keep which already has approximately 60 entries in the dictionary. As a lexicographer you’d have to verify each one of those existing meanings to ensure they’re current and also look for any new uses of the word. This significantly increases the level of difficulty, and while I could have come up with complex formulas and put them in a spreadsheet to narrow a pool of lexicographers down to only one it just seemed like too much effort, besides I’m sure they’d prefer not to be rushed in the process.

In order to become my favorite in this area one doesn’t have to be on the road to the hall of fame among the Dictionary Society of North America (DSNA). It’s not a contest, it’s just what I get to choose. At the time of writing this chapter my favorite lexicographer is Erin McKean. She’s a darling lady who took the time to write a couple of books and record a few TED talks on the subject of lexicography. She’s the one that helped expose a fascinating field of interest that I was able to bring into my life. She’s publicly stated that she wants to “help make every word in the English language ‘lookupable’ – including the 52% of unique English words that aren’t currently in any dictionary.” Certainly a noble goal, because those obscure words are simply delightful.

One of the most beautiful things about selecting a favorite lexicographer over a favorite football player is that there’s really no hall of fame or Heisman Trophy competition with statistics for anyone to dispute your claim. You just pick a favorite and that’s your favorite. As long as you can explain why, you’re good to go. Although it’s still a bit of a shame that there isn’t a Nobel Prize for lexicography. It might help more people be aware of the vital part of our society these people play and to appreciate them more.

One might imagine from my description of a lexicographer above that these good people sit around all day dreaming up words to force us to use. The reality is quite the opposite. Language is much more federated and dynamic than it is hierarchical. Most things are created when there’s a need. The same is true with words. When there is a need a word is invented. But a word invented for the use of one person doesn’t mean the word gets added to the language. Others have to approve and adopt the word as well. Lexicographers are the archaeologists searching out the use of these words in context to communicate their meaning to a broader audience.

You can imagine how with today’s technology language is changing meaning faster than it ever has before. Let’s take a look at a rather humble word, Priority. For the first 500 years of its existence it was a singular word.1 Think of it’s original meaning as first thing. Then in the 1900’s it got pluralized. An s was added to the end and now there were multiple first things. We had multiple priorities. Once you have multiple priorities there must be a verb to organize them. Thus in 1972 during a televised presidential debate2 one of the candidate introduced the word prioritize to the audience. Now we had a name for the verb that means to organize a list based upon importance. Its quick adoption by many who watched gave lexicographers plenty of artifacts to enable them to understand its meaning and add it to the dictionary.

How interesting that for the first 500 years this word had only one entry in the dictionary and no conjugation. This means that if you were to use priority everyone understood its meaning. There would be no discussion about the context of the word. In could express a singular thought beautifully. Words with multiple definitions can lead to some interesting discussions, especially in a court of law were definitions of things matter significantly. There was another time in the 1990s when a president responded to a question one day with the reply “it depends on what the meaning of the word is, is.3

Interestingly enough, there’s only one definition for is in the dictionary, but there are 7 definitions for the verb to-be.

Governments, while well intentioned, aren’t always run by the most ideal people. So, instead of functioning as the society’s operating system they tend to operate with the interests of the government in mind.

Government education generally carries with it certain traits. One, the history books they purchased by the governement tend to focus on the government’s history instead of the history of the people. Two they see everything as geography based. Three they introduce jobs that tend to have heavy ties to the government. Ask a group of students in elementary school what they want to be when they grow up and you’ll get a bunch of firemen, police men, teachers, lawyers, astronauts, and doctors. Every one of those industries is heavily involved or subsidized through the government. I’m probably a little more sensitive to this issue than most parents, but there is a part of what my kids were being exposed to at school that seemed nothing more than a marketing campaign for public sector jobs.

So, I decided to do something about it.

Right around the same time that I learned about lexicography and Erin McKean was precisely the same time my second son was getting asked what he wanted to be when when he grew up, at school. So I trained him that if he ever gets asked that question he should respond with ‘I want to be a Lexicographer.’ Then explain that it’s the person who puts words in the dictionary. I then went the next layer knowing that my son would probably get asked what his favorite word was, I proceeded to teach him the word absquatulate.

The word means, to leave quickly. And so, to avoid making this any more political than necessary we should quickly leave this post.

1 https://jamesclear.com/multitasking-myth
2 https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/318395/usage-and-origin-of-prioritize
3 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yp3TQf2xDc8

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.